Monday, August 23, 2010

LIVES & HALF-LIVES: A LOVE STORY

Lives & Half-Lives: A Love Story

I once saw a small boy stop cold on an Alabama sidewalk when he saw a half-brick in his path: just a common red building brick with dirty white mortar still stuck to its sides. He had been chatting about something happily, holding fast to his mother's hand, but when the brick presented itself, he dropped her hand, forgetting her completely, as he was struck by the half-brick there before him on the concrete walkway of the city. He squatted down to look at it more closely.

Huh!? he gasped, expelling all the air in his mouth and lungs quickly like someone who's been sucker-punched. He was in an altered state. State of awe. Or reverence. Or wonder. Whatever it was that so captivated him about that half-brick, his mother had a dickens of a time pulling him off of it. No matter what she said about its worthlessness ("It's just an old brick" and "There are hundreds of them in that building over there") he sat there staring and staring at it, as if it were gold. Finally, though, and because she was growing impatient with him, the boy let her take his hand again and move him on down the sidewalk towards wherever it was they were heading that morning, though the boy continued looking backwards, over his shoulder, at that dislodged, busted brick until the two of them rounded a corner and were no longer in sight.

It occurred to me that the boy had remarkable vision – not sight, mind you, but vision, that seeing-beyond what is visible to the ordinary eye. He was asking the deep questions about what had fallen in his path. He was seeing the possibilities, mulling them over. Wondering.

I taught my first writing class in 1997 at St. Mary's College of Southern Maryland – a workshop of twelve aspiring young writers. After a few weeks of workshop, the students struck me as an unusually uninspired bunch: they disliked the work of writing, though they often spoke dreamily of what it would be like to be published and "famous." And worse, I was beginning to detect traces, in their writings, of boredom with the known world, that old ho-hum of the jaded cynic. In discussions, they mostly complained about the literary canon, mocking what was, claiming they would write and breathe life into the literary world, something radical and "new." They were the self-proclaimed revolutionaries of contemporary American literature. They had adopted, for themselves, dull green and brown t-shirts with the face of Che Guevara on the front and they wore those shirts to campus with great pride, though I doubted they really understood anything about Guevara's revolution. Even then, I knew how easy it is to speak of making a difference in the world from the comfort of an air-conditioned, well-lit, well-appointed corner of academia.

So I thought I'd take them out of that comfortable element one day, that I'd get them out of the classroom with its polished veneer conference table and gray upholstered chairs, and I'd get them - and their backsides - back in touch with the nitty-gritty of the actual world. I wouldn't even have to take them very far: just out into the courtyard, to the bell-tower and brick walkways of the college itself. I borrowed, from a colleague in the sciences, a Geiger-Mueller Detector – colloquially-known as a Geiger Counter – and I led the twelve young writers out into the bright afternoon sun, to the little bricked square under the north clock-tower. It was a warm day in Southern Maryland, but not uncomfortably so. And this wasn't about "comfort" anyway, I reminded myself. I had them sit down on the bricked walks and instructed them to just listen to the bricks around them, to be out there among them, to touch them, to put their ears against the wall and walkways, and to listen to the stories the bricks had to tell. After half an hour or so, we'd gather back under the clock tower and they'd have to tell us all the "story" the bricks had told them.

I saw the side-long glances they threw each other as they turned to walk up and down along the brick walks and walls that made up the little courtyard, that old Oh-my-God-why-does-she-have-us-doing-this look. So the half-hour passed uneventfully and they gathered back under the clock-tower, sitting dutifully down in a circle and leaving a little extra space, for good measure, between me and the ones on either side of me: just like they did each Wednesday afternoon in the classroom. When I asked who wanted to go first, I was surprised to see them pulling sheets of paper from their notebooks and pockets. After all, I'd said we'd tell each other the stories, not write them down. But I kept quiet and let it play itself out, for better or worse.

Then, as one after another read their "stories," I could see they had not only written them down, they'd also been revising them, editing and changing them along the way, scratching out a word here and there, inserting paragraphs in the margins, drawing little arrows so they'd remember the order. All this in half an hour! One brick, it turned out, had a step-mother who rivaled Cinderella's in cruelty. Another had a recent heartache. Another, unrequited love. Another brick spoke only in gerunds, no nouns, no actual verbs. all single words down the left-hand margin of the page, something faintly resembling a poem. One brick was giving the listener the cold shoulder, refusing to talk. Another told a story about a frat party-gone-wrong and all its morning-after regrets.

What a coincidence: the bricks were telling the same stories the young writers had been telling, in obscure poetry or dull prose, for weeks now.

When all the stories had been shared aloud, I stood up. I took the small Geiger Counter out of the brown grocery sack I'd brought out to the courtyard with me. I turned the dial and walked up and down the bricks of the columns, the bricks of the walkways, the bricks of the walled structures. I ran the sensor over the newer bricks of the clock tower. It chattered, sometimes slowly, sometimes a little more quickly. Chattered. It was the only sound around us. For a long time, it seemed, no one spoke. Only the bricks were talking.

I kept my silence too, putting the Geiger Counter back into the sack again and taking my place again among the students. And in the awkward weightiness of my silence - something which they could never bear for long - their questions began: Are bricks radioactive? Why? Is this something to be worried about – after all, the college is mostly brick? What does this have to do with writing? Is this some metaphor?

And so on. And so forth.

When they had ceased their chattering, I took out a cassette player on which I'd recorded what two of my sons and two friends of theirs had said the night before when I'd brought them out there and put them through the exercise as a sort of "test run" for today's lesson. Here's what they'd said:

1. These bricks are foreigners. They don't speak English so they can only talk to the ivy and the gnats. Sure, they might be telling the gnats and mosquitoes their stories, but I can't understand a single word. It's like when my mom and dad fight: I don't know what the words mean. I just wanna get outta there.

2. If I ever do something terrible and it starts to eat me up, I will come out here and tell my horrible secret to these bricks. They keep everybody's secrets. Even their own.

3. Today I have a headache and a sore throat, so I have to whisper. I think I might have an earache too because all I hear when I put my ear against this brick is ticking. Like a little clock. Like a big fat time-bomb ready to go off.

4. My mom's a little nuts. She thinks bricks can tell a story. That just proves how nuts she is. Now all of us guys are starting to act nutty too, because we don't want to hurt her feelings or make her cry. Knowing my mom, I bet she comes out here sometimes and listens to this wall. I bet when nobody is looking, she gets down on her hands and knees and puts her ear down to this brick walk, just like the Indians used to do when they were listening for the calvary [sic] to come riding in. I don't hear a thing, but I bet she does. She's always listening for something. That's how nuts she is.

The boys and I had continued to sit there for a long time in the courtyard, chatting amiably, while the dusk descended and the gnats swarmed and made little tornado shapes in the air around us. We laughed and laughed at each others' stories and we made up a few more just for the fun of it. We were strangely happy. Full of that giddy, silly feeling that comes over you when you just feel the pleasure of playing with words and ideas and you're not being graded for it. When it got dark and the mosquitoes, the little blood-suckers, came out in earnest, we all piled back into my old yellow station wagon and drove into Lexington Park for ice cream sundaes, my treat to them for having helped me out with the lesson. It seemed a fitting ending to a good evening together: something sweet with a lot of calories.

When the sundaes were brought to the table, one of the boys asked the waitress if she could see anything in his ear. Like what? she asked, squinting up her face and peering into his ear canal. Oh, he answered, brick dust. Or gnats. She backed off to a safe distance and the boys laughed at her reaction. Their version of a little inside joke.

But that afternoon on campus, after the actual class lesson was over and the workshop time was up, my undergrads patiently packed their notebooks and folded their notes into their backpacks and book-bags, stood up, and dusted the dirt from their purposely-tattered jeans before stumbling off to their next classes. They seemed unhappy to have been upstaged by four little boys and a Geiger Counter. I felt like the worst teacher ever. What had I been thinking? By the time they get to higher education, students have been too well-schooled to just let go and enjoy anything ever again, in the classroom at least. Grades are at stake here. Scholarships. Degrees. Careers and salaries are attached to everything they are working for. How, by then, can you un-teach them all those well-learned lessons so they can learn how to see something wondrous again in the world and in themselves, and to marvel at it with something akin to pleasure? How can you introduce them to thenew old world all over again, these little self-proclaimed revolutionaries of literature? I didn't know. I still don't know. It's like explaining how to fall in love: it can't be done directly. You have to tell it slant. And my slant on it all had failed so utterly, it hurt a little. From life to half-life, just like that.

In the years since that afternoon, I have wondered often at those students' lack of wonder, their absence of delight. It troubles me. Deeply. What had jaded them so at such a young age, what hurt them so deeply that they had walled off their hearts and couldn't even hear the ticking underneath it all – that little time-bomb of mortality? I wondered what they made of that lesson and the chattering bricks, wondered if it has ever even occurred to them.

Not long ago, a letter arrived in my campus office in Alaska: it was from a young man who'd been in that undergraduate writing workshop. He was writing to tell me that he'd gone on to earn his BA in Language and Literature, a MS in Nuclear Physics and then, later, his Doctor of Divinity degree, that he was married with a son and was working now as a minister for a small church in upper New York State. He wrote that he'd thought about that lesson in the courtyard from time to time and it bothered him that he thought he'd missed something important in it. He'd learned, somewhere along the way, about that radiation in the bricks, about the process of brick-making, and the lives and half-lives of the radioactive ore used to make them. He went on to tell me about how the ore that is used in refractory brick is commonly found alongside the presence of naturally-occurring radioactive elements such as uranium and thorium. These bricks aren't dangerous, he assured me, even though they emit enough of a "pulse" to sometimes send a Geiger Counter chattering. Not dangerous, that is, unless one was to crush the brick into a fine powder and dust and then expose humans to it.

His letter went on to discuss what he'd learned of the lives and half-lives of some common elements:Carbon-14 has a half-life of 5,730 years whereas the half-life of Uranium-230 is somewhere around 4.5 billion years. Imagine that, he wrote, a half-life of four-and-a-half billion years!

I thought I heard, just then, something like wonder creeping into his voice. He'd finally, all these years later, started the conversation I'd hoped to have on that spring afternoon in Southern Maryland. And had I been so inclined, I would have written back to him about my experience with some of the half-lives of medicine's nuclear discoveries, like those which use Iodine-131 which has a half-life of only 8 days: what procedures it is used in and what we can see in its "ghost" as it travels whitely through the human body. But I didn't tell him that story. Anyone could have told him that one. I had a different tale to tell. A story about how the earth was made and how it still ticks wildly with a radioactivity that's been there from its birth. It's a good story, I think, and as plausible as any. It was a story I thought a young minister might appreciate.

I have a story for you too, I wrote back to him yesterday, about the chattering bricks. They have been made, like us, from the earth – the dust and ash and the clay and spittle of it – the earth, which is also made up of naturally-occurring radioactive materials (NORMs, they are called, and how appropros that acronym seems). The bricks' story, I went on, is the story of the earth. Their story begins almost where the dead sea scrolls began their story: " In the beginning, God, the heavens, and the earth. . . ."

It gets me to thinking, today, about how most things seem to retain some of the characteristics of their making, like us, like humans, both those ticking, volatile, detectable elements and the silent mysteries of creation and what things have put us through the fire, have forged us, have made us who we are. We have the imprint of our making all over us, the fingermarks of creation, literal and figurative. So much is still unknown to us, so much still to wonder at and about in the crumbling mortar of our world and ourselves. And what of writers, those of us who tell the stories, compose the poems: who among us can mark the time, the precise moment, when that thing we call our life meets the moment of our half-life, that moment where the steady and precise decline into the final silence begins, that moment when the chatter of our lives grows faint, then fainter, and then is no longer discernible to any listening ear?

photo by Anne Caston, taken in St. Mary's City, Maryland, 2010


Tuesday, August 17, 2010


Kitchen Mercies: Remembering the Maker

Today is soap-making day. The kitchen smells bittery and sweet, a mix of the lime and the sugar (I'm making Lime Rickey Goats Milk Soaps) and, smelling that sweet lime fragrance all day, I just want to eat the refrigerator empty again. Something that smells this good ought to be edible. I'm sure something about this fragrance will be deadly for my waistline if I'm not careful.

Today, while I stir soap, I am remembering my grandmother, Fleecy Lavinia Caston, and am grateful for how she passed the old ways down to me when I was a girl: about soap-making, about tatting and sewing, and especially how to take threadbare scraps and bits of fabric and put them together with cotton thread and a silver needle so tiny you could barely see it, all in hopes of making something beautiful and functional as a quilt. One winter afternoon when I was four, she showed me how to make a doll from a cotton diaper, embroidering the face by hand, using yarn for hair, wrapping it all into a blanket remnant so I had a baby doll which, at that age, I wanted very much. I thought it was a miracle. I hope I thanked her for it.

My grandmother never had much, not in the years I knew her anyway, but she certainly knew how to be grateful for the things she did have: for good friends, for a simple home-cooked meal like turnip greens, and for a piece of sweet cornbread crumbled into a cold glass of buttermilk. She saved her pennies and, once a month or so, we'd put on our "walking shoes" and walk to the Woolworth's where she'd buy herself a spool of tatting thread and treat me to rock candy on a stick. She knew the value of a clean conscience and a good night's sleep and a peaceful heart and I think she may have passed a longing for those things along to me, though I admit here to you today that those lessons were slow in coming to me.

Today, I'm recalling that, as much as she taught me how to piece and quilt, how to make soap and "make do," she also taught me about being kind to others, about minding my manners, about being thankful, and about how mercy is sometimes better than justice. It isn't that she talked to me about any of these things directly; rather, I watched her live these things out in front of me as I grew from being a small girl into young womanhood. She was kind to everyone we encountered in our walks and in the stores or at the post office, even kind to people who weren't always so kind to her. She delighted in people, with ALL their quirks. She never forgot to thank the people who held the door for her or bagged her groceries, those who complimented her, or those neighbors who brought her a potted geranium or slice of pie. And she always liberally dished out mercy for me when she might have just as easily judged me. I appreciated that about her most of all, I think. I was awkward, shy, prone to blushing and stammering, easily flustered and frustrated, and she acted as if I were the smartest, most clever, best thing she'd ever had come into her life. Everyone needs someone like that in a childhood, and I was fortunate to have her. I know that now; I knew it then.

It's only natural that I think of her today, here in my old farmhouse kitchen in central Pennsylvania, bare-footed, measuring (haphazardly) the goats milk and the fragrance oils, stirring the hot soap mix in a warped aluminum pan until the soap is smooth and milky and setting up, then pouring it into molds. Even when I am the only one home, I am never alone on days when I make soap: I imagine her back to me as I stir and pour, imagine hearing again her gravelly voice as she leans over the cookstove muttering, Umm-umm. Now THAT'S something to write home about.

Sunday, August 15, 2010


Deep Thoughts in Deep Dixie

This morning I wrote to a friend that I was returning today to a ruined homestead I'd stumbled upon yesterday in the woods near Cecil's Mill in Southern Maryland. I told her how the little shack was perched on a muddy ledge near a running creek, that the tin roof was rusted and coming apart, that the whole back side of the house had fallen away – that it all had probably tumbled into the creek below it years ago – and that I had been able to see right through the back of it and into the trees beyond. I told her about the rusted padlock on what had once been a front door with one of those old knobs that you see for sale in antique stores all over the country. I described for her the rotting timbers of the door and the busted windows and how the one dingy white curtain that remained hung still, torn and in tatters, at the window.

How interesting, she wrote back, Tell me more.

So I told her I'd send her a link to the piece I was writing on the new blog about the little house I'd found and that she could see the photographs of it there too.

BLOG? she wrote back in capital letters, YOU have a blog? (Despite everyone's complaints to the contrary, it's pretty easy to read tone in an email. I'd have gotten her drift right away, but she went on.)

Oh blogs, she wrote, what a nuisance they are: all those ridiculously deep thoughts…like what diet bar some vegan woman goes for when she's starving, or how a man is thinking of leaving his wife because he has "fallen in love" with the wife of his best friend. What some 16-year-old Valley girl had for breakfast. Who got new boobs and how much it cost her old man. . . .

How simple it is, then, to ridicule the lives of others, and what is important to them. I wondered if this is how everyone feels, secretly, but doesn't have the heart – or tactlessness – to say so.

Still, I have to admit it made me think back to that scene in the movie, Julie & Julia. You remember it: the moment where Julie steps out of her little kitchen and announces to her husband, "I have thoughts. I could write a blog."

As if to merely have thoughts is the essence of writing. As if "I-think-therefore-I-am" is sufficient to keep anyone interested in the story you are telling.

Maybe it is. For some. But my thoughts don't run that deep. (Or that shallow.) Whatever this wild river is that I'm on right now, I'm going with the current of it and hanging on to any drifting thing nearby to keep myself afloat. But she got me to thinking – again – about why I'm writing. It's not as if there aren't already thousands of interesting blogs and books and articles out there. And it's not as if I have hundreds of readers: I have a scant handful of people who read these postings regularly and most of them are good friends and even some of them read the stuff I write, I suspect, out of reckless pity and compassion:

Oh dear. Anne's doing that writing thing again. . . .

Let's be honest here: my life is full-to-bursting as it is. Why take on one more commitment each week? Why crawl around in the woods and climb into the rotting haylofts of old tobacco barns; why hang at the frozen edge of a fence waiting for muskox to step forward from the ice-fog or watch the cat studying the wasp's nest in the eaves with great interest; why pay such relentless attention to all the small, ordinary things as I'm inclined to do? Why do all that if there isn't some story waiting there, patient as eternity, for someone – maybe me – to discover it and bring it into the raw light-of-the-world-we-live-in-now?

Or, as I put it in my notebook this morning while I was "out there in the real world," getting messy with it: Why leave the muggy woods and the tangle of underbrush you spent all afternoon picking your way through – red-faced, thirsty, jeans muddy and your shoes wrecked with river mud – just to settle back into a car and discover a snake has settled himself there, seeking out a little cool shade, while you were out traipsing through the underbrush? Why throw yourself out onto the ground then, thrashing about in terror, though your brain has already registered that it's only a little green snake. Harmless. Well, nearly harmless except for the heart-failure you experienced when he suddenly slithered under the gas pedal near your foot. At best, it was embarrassing. And no one even saw it: you flailing around on the ground like that, hung half-in/half-out of the Land Rover like you were having some sort of grand mal seizure in the dirt at the side of the road.

Maybe I write because, as the physical body fails and the soul's dwelling-place washes down to almost-nothing-left-now, it seems I still have words to serve as some little channel marker on the sea that indicates I was here, in this time, in this century, in this place or that. Here or there. Snooping around in the woods or the cool caves or along the mud-banks of the rivers. Poking my nose into other people's business - or what's left of it anyway.

My father says that my four children are what will be left of me and I should be happy with that. Maybe he's right. I don't know. I know I prefer not to burden them with all that. I gave them their lives once, rather ingloriously: strapped to a gurney on my back, my sock feet up in the gleaming stirrups, pushing each one of them into the blue-white light and sterile chrome of the delivery room in the latter quarter of the last century. I named them. And then, when they grew up and became who they wanted to be, I sent them out again with my blessings into their own happinesses and troubles. They will have enough to do, I suspect, without having to be some kind of living memorial to their mother.

But these writings, these notes, the two books I have written and published and the ones still to be written – Lord willing and the creek don't rise, as my people are wont to say, setting the blessing over the curse – these are some odd version of a ship's journal, I think, something I'll leave behind when the tide of what-is-coming finally takes me under. Every poem, every essay, every blog-piece lets those who come after me know some things about who I was and the moment in history in which I lived out my life. It lets them see the map and the stars I steered by. Where I went. What I saw. What I heard or overheard. What spoke to me over the din and dull racket of this world and all its machinery.

Here, it will say on one waterlogged page, I was here today. I saw this. I heard that. This thing troubled me. I gave myself over to that. And there, right there, is where I made it through a dark storm. Here, I was swept overboard. I traveled for a time in the dark, quiet belly of Leviathan. I had a sea-changed here. Only the moon looked on. Here is where I was swept away. . . .

And alongside those entries will be others too, entries not so much about me: You were with me here. I saw you there, from a distance. You waved to someone. You seemed happy. I almost knew you. I lost you there. I've placed a marker for you here. . . .

Kitchen Mercies




Saturday, August 7, 2010

Deep Thoughts in Deep Dixie

Deep Thoughts in Deep Dixie

This morning I wrote to a friend that I was returning today to a ruined homestead I'd stumbled upon yesterday in the woods near Cecil's Mill in Southern Maryland. I told her how the little shack was perched on a muddy ledge near a running creek, that the tin roof was rusted and coming apart, that the whole back side of the house had fallen away – that it all had probably tumbled into the creek below it years ago – and that I had been able to see right through the back of it and into the trees beyond. I told her about the rusted padlock on what had once been a front door with one of those old knobs that you see for sale in antique stores all over the country. I described for her the rotting timbers of the door and the busted windows and how the one dingy white curtain that remained hung still, torn and in tatters, at the window.

How interesting, she wrote back, Tell me more.

So I told her I'd send her a link to the piece I was writing on the new blog about the little house I'd found and that she could see the photographs of it there too.

BLOG? she wrote back in capital letters, YOU have a blog? (Despite everyone's complaints to the contrary, it's pretty easy to read tone in an email. I'd have gotten her drift right away, but she went on.)

Oh blogs, she wrote, what a nuisance they are: all those ridiculously deep thoughts…like what diet bar some vegan woman goes for when she's starving, or how a man is thinking of leaving his wife because he has "fallen in love" with the wife of his best friend. What some 16-year-old Valley girl had for breakfast. Who got new boobs and how much it cost her old man. . . .

How simple it is, then, to ridicule the lives of others, and what is important to them. I wondered if this is how everyone feels, secretly, but doesn't have the heart – or tactlessness – to say so.

Still, I have to admit it made me think back to that scene in the movie, Julie & Julia. You remember it: the moment where Julie steps out of her little kitchen and announces to her husband, "I have thoughts. I could write a blog."

As if to merely have thoughts is the essence of writing. As if "I-think-therefore-I-am" is sufficient to keep anyone interested in the story you are telling.

Maybe it is. For some. But my thoughts don't run that deep. (Or that shallow.) Whatever this wild river is that I'm on right now, I'm going with the current of it and hanging on to any drifting thing nearby to keep myself afloat. But she got me to thinking – again – about why I'm writing. It's not as if there aren't already thousands of interesting blogs and books and articles out there. And it's not as if I have hundreds of readers: I have a scant handful of people who read these postings regularly and most of them are good friends and even some of them read the stuff I write, I suspect, out of reckless pity and compassion:

Oh dear. Anne's doing that writing thing again. . . .

Let's be honest here: my life is full-to-bursting as it is. Why take on one more commitment each week? Why crawl around in the woods and climb into the rotting haylofts of old tobacco barns; why hang at the frozen edge of a fence waiting for muskox to step forward from the ice-fog or watch the cat studying the wasp's nest in the eaves with great interest; why pay such relentless attention to all the small, ordinary things as I'm inclined to do? Why do all that if there isn't some story waiting there, patient as eternity, for someone – maybe me – to discover it and bring it into the raw light-of-the-world-we-live-in-now?

Or, as I put it in my notebook this morning while I was "out there in the real world," getting messy with it: Why leave the muggy woods and the tangle of underbrush you spent all afternoon picking your way through – red-faced, thirsty, jeans muddy and your shoes wrecked with river mud – just to settle back into a car and discover a snake has settled himself there, seeking out a little cool shade, while you were out traipsing through the underbrush? Why throw yourself out onto the ground then, thrashing about in terror, though your brain has already registered that it's only a little green snake. Harmless. Well, nearly harmless except for the heart-failure you experienced when he suddenly slithered under the gas pedal near your foot. At best, it was embarrassing. And no one even saw it: you flailing around on the ground like that, hung half-in/half-out of the Land Rover like you were having some sort of grand mal seizure in the dirt at the side of the road.

Maybe I write because, as the physical body fails and the soul's dwelling-place washes down to almost-nothing-left-now, it seems I still have words to serve as some little channel marker on the sea that indicates I was here, in this time, in this century, in this place or that. Here or there. Snooping around in the woods or the cool caves or along the mud-banks of the rivers. Poking my nose into other people's business - or what's left of it anyway.

My father says that my four children are what will be left of me and I should be happy with that. Maybe he's right. I don't know. I know I prefer not to burden them with all that. I gave them their lives once, rather ingloriously: strapped to a gurney on my back, my sock feet up in the gleaming stirrups, pushing each one of them into the blue-white light and sterile chrome of the delivery room in the latter quarter of the last century. I named them. And then, when they grew up and became who they wanted to be, I sent them out again with my blessings into their own happinesses and troubles. They will have enough to do, I suspect, without having to be some kind of living memorial to their mother.

But these writings, these notes, the two books I have written and published and the ones still to be written – Lord willing and the creek don't rise, as my people are wont to say, setting the blessing over the curse – these are some odd version of a ship's journal, I think, something I'll leave behind when the tide of what-is-coming finally takes me under. Every poem, every essay, every blog-piece lets those who come after me know some things about who I was and the moment in history in which I lived out my life. It lets them see the map and the stars I steered by. Where I went. What I saw. What I heard or overheard. What spoke to me over the din and dull racket of this world and all its machinery.

Here, it will say on one waterlogged page, I was here today. I saw this. I heard that. This thing troubled me. I gave myself over to that. And there, right there, is where I made it through a dark storm. Here, I was swept overboard. I traveled for a time in the dark, quiet belly of Leviathan. I had a sea-changed here. Only the moon looked on. Here is where I was swept away. . . .

And alongside those entries will be others too, entries not so much about me: You were with me here. I saw you there, from a distance. You waved to someone. You seemed happy. I almost knew you. I lost you there. I've placed a marker for you here. . . .

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Crossing The Devil's Heart


"Now you must go out into your own heart as onto a vast plain."

- Rainer Maria Rilke


If you look at my birth certificate, you will know some things about me. You will see that I was born in May, 1953; that I was the first-born – a daughter – of Thomas Caston Philyaw (20 years of age) and Ruth Ann Philyaw (17 years of age); that I was born in the Ouachita Memorial Hospital in Clark County; that I was a "live" birth; and that the town of my birth was Arkadelphia, in Arkansas.

And that is all true. Or mostly true. The part that isn't accurate, not exactly, is the name of that town: Arkadelphia – Arkadelphia, which is now one of the "Fifty Fabulous Places to Raise Your Family," according to the City of Arkadelphia website. What isn't there - either on my birth certificate or on the website - is the name by which the town used to be known: Arkadelphia is the sanitized name of the that little town set on a bluff overlooking the Ouachita River in the foothills of the Ouachita Mountains. Every map you look at now will point to that place as Arkadelphia. But the original name was a bit more precise, a bit less Baptist, a town named first by the early Scottish and Irish settlers in the region, a name that spoke to the wild nature of the place. The town had been renamed Arkadelphia by the good Methodists and Baptists who settled there much later and who had been much unsettled by the town's former name: Devil's Heart.

Those first Scots and Irish named the town Devil's Heart for the way sudden and terrible storms originated there in the little gully town between the mountains and the river below them. Violent storms seemed to come up out of nowhere, moving outward in all directions from there, devastating the outlying tenant farms and homesteads, leaving houses splintered and crops uprooted and scattered. Lightning struck the trees and set wild-fires among the thick forests; tornadoes set the treetops whirling and lifted shanties off their dirt floors; animals, it is said, went mad with fright when thunder rumbled underground, thunder that occurred with the regularity of freight trains. Rumor has it that in the foothills, in the hardest wintry years, babies were born ruined or stillborn. And once, in a freak summer windstorm, a weathervane spun so hard it lifted off and circled a barn-yard before flying into the window of a sharecropper's shack.

No wonder they named it as they had. No wonder it stuck, that name. No wonder the old-timers whispered that name - Devil's Heart - and crossed themselves after saying it. And so I come, later in my life, to the truth of my birthplace and my birthright: I was born in that stormy place, dead-center of the Devil's Heart which is, it seems, somewhere in Arkansas.